Senator Panfilo "Ping" Lacson
stated that Senator Alan Peter Cayetano "belongs in jail" following
an escalating public feud over allegations of personal corruption, legislative
waste, and anomalies in flood control funding.
The bitter dispute between the two
lawmakers involves three core conflicts:
Attacks on Personal Integrity: In July 2026, Cayetano questioned Lacson’s
personal wealth via a Facebook livestream, pointing out that Lacson's declared
net worth had doubled. Lacson fiercely defended his finances attributing his
earnings to legitimate real estate deals and declared that Cayetano had "crossed
the line". Lacson announced he is actively gathering informants and
witnesses to build a criminal case to put Cayetano in jail.
The Flood Control Scandal: Lacson has accused Cayetano of securing ₱6.79
billion in unauthorized budget insertions (pork barrel) under the 2025
national budget. Furthermore, Lacson alleged that there are "ghost"
flood control projects in Cayetano’s political stronghold of Taguig City. He
claimed Taguig's city engineer amassed ₱500 million in casino winnings while
executing these questionable infrastructure funds.
Wasted Senate Funds: Lacson also publicly accused Cayetano of wasting roughly
₱700 million in taxpayers' money during Cayetano's chaotic 28-day tenure as
Senate President before he was ousted. Lacson cited a total "zero
output" of legislative work during that month due to political boycotts
and gridlock. In response, Cayetano has dismissed Lacson’s math regarding the
Senate expenses as faulty. Cayetano has instead characterized himself as the
true anti-corruption advocate, claiming that recent state investigations
against him regarding infrastructure funding are politically motivated attempts
by the majority bloc to intimidate the opposition.
My Review on this issue
The escalating feud between Senators
Lacson and Cayetano over alleged corruption, ₱6.79 billion in budget
insertions, and ₱700 million in wasted funds highlights a critical crisis of
accountability in Philippine governance. By resorting to personal attacks and
threats of imprisonment rather than institutional scrutiny, the lawmakers'
actions demonstrate a systemic vulnerability in the Senate, undermining public
trust and leaving vital infrastructure projects in question. An independent
investigation by the Ombudsman and the Commission on Audit is required to move
beyond political theater and address these serious allegations.